Main

June 28, 2007

Are Children an Utter Joy?

The answer is apparently, no.

I came across this Time Magazine article by Daniel Gilbert, which I will excerpt below.

We're all told there's nothing more joyous than having/raising children. When you set aside the phenomenon I experience here in North Texas with the inordinate number of "jesus freakish" women who believe that their children are not only a perpetual joy, but also never do a thing wrong with regard to interacting with others, there are still scores that want us to believe that children are a significant (if not perpetual) source of happiness and joy.

With that in mind, I give you this:

Studies reveal that most married couples start out happy and then become progressively less satisfied over the course of their lives, becoming especially disconsolate when their children are in diapers and in adolescence, and returning to their initial levels of happiness only after their children have had the decency to grow up and go away. When the popular press invented a malady called "empty-nest syndrome," it failed to mention that its primary symptom is a marked increase in smiling.
What? Are you serious? Why would I want this? I'm barely hangin' on now? Now you're going to give me a little bundle of depression that I can't get rid of EVER!?!
Psychologists have measured how people feel as they go about their daily activities, and have found that people are less happy when they are interacting with their children than when they are eating, exercising, shopping or watching television. Indeed, an act of parenting makes most people about as happy as an act of housework. Economists have modeled the impact of many variables on people's overall happiness and have consistently found that children have only a small impact. A small negative impact.
As happy as housework. Wow... I guess the good news is that it's only a "small negative impact."
Our children give us many things, but an increase in our average daily happiness is probably not among them. Rather than deny that fact, we should celebrate it. Our ability to love beyond all measure those who try our patience and weary our bones is at once our most noble and most human quality.
Screw that! At this point I can think of only a couple of compelling reasons to have kids now.
  1. Someone to take over house chores. If one day I have a son, I look forward to the day when I can show him the lawn mower and edger and then go have a beer.
  2. Who else is going to take care of me when I'm old?
  3. Okay, I thought I could think of a third reason, but there really aren't any more, are there..... and to be honest with you, those reasons aren't that compelling anyway.

February 24, 2007

Worst. Phishing. Email. Evarrrr.

The links that say "monster.com" go to monster. The other doesn't even pretend to be from monster (and I won't type it in here).

October 4, 2006

Google Gadgets!

Huzzah!











September 22, 2006

Full Circle

June 29, 2006

Happy Anniversary, Baby!

It's been a great year, with many more to come. I love you!

Most Useless Wikipedia Article

PoS and I also discussed some of the uselessness of a LOT of the articles on Wikipedia, as we discussed how I had put a reference to the Wikipedia article on "Pencil" in my Master's Degree earning report, and wondering who would waste the time and effort to put such a thing together....

And we thought that perhaps some form of competition was in order to see who could find the most useless Wikipedia entry. Right now the definition of such is pretty objective, so we'll need to get some rules down, but here's the intial "feel"...

1. The article should be about something innocuous - it shouldn't be a minor component of a major historical, industrial, etc, event or item, such that if you think about it actually turns out to be important. It needs to stand on its own. Note: This doesn't exclude trivia that has no significance - finding an article about Napoleon's love of turkey sandwiches MAY be eligible...but only if it didn't lead to some sort of military strategy put into use, or some other historical timeline.

2. The article about such an item should be written in a way that it doesn't really leave you any more educated or informed after reading it as you were before.

3. It should be something you don't care about, never have cared about, or never would have considered caring about.

4. It should be something so that if somebody asked you about it 10 minutes after having read it, you would look at the person as if they were crazy.

5. Native language/name doesn't matter, but the entry has to be in English.

Here's my first offering:

Storbergsmasten

June 21, 2006

All behold Dirk's Wiki!

Dirk's Wiki is fully functional again. To get there, click on the link on the left side under the "Links"...

June 19, 2006

ButterWizard!

If your butter never seems to spread when you want it to, or you’ve compromised on taste for convenience by opting for margarine or easy spread products, then look no further…the answer is here with the ButterWizard!

June 10, 2006

I am...Donald Rumsfeld

June 9, 2006

I am...George W. Bush

April 6, 2006

Oh, Snap.

Check this out:VW in da haus...

Blah

Another wasted day at work...I haven't really worked in six months. My workstation is hosed and the IT guy is going to take till at least tomorrow sometime to get it "fixed" (although he did the hosing - it worked just fine before).

Blah.